Filesonic uploading faster with rapidleech than sborg?

[masterb56]

I'm using the latest version of sborg and it seems its uploading is slower than that of the updated filesonic rapidleech upload plugin. I've connected to both NL and US filesonic servers and they are extremely fast on rapidleech but on sborg it hangs with a file or two.

Anyone facing the same problems?

masterb56 Reviewed by masterb56 on 16th Jul 2011. Filesonic uploading faster with rapidleech than sborg? I'm using the latest version of sborg and it seems its uploading is slower than that of the updated filesonic rapidleech upload plugin. I've connected to both NL and US filesonic servers and they are extremely fast on rapidleech :O but on sborg it hangs with a file or two. Anyone facing the same problems? :( Rating: 5

[Aquickhost]

IMo, Rapidleech is way faster than sborg many a times. Its normal.

[CyberAff]

i am getting 40mb/s with sBorg. i tried filesonic on rapidleech before. and it was a little slow,

whatever sBorg

[masterb56]

CyberAff I'm talking about now - with the recent plugin update from the rapidleech forum. I dunno, maybe the api for filesonic has changed and sborg might be using an old one... (just a guess)

[Jason_weds_Freddy]

I get 0.5MBPS upload speed to filesonic from sborg.. but it's unlimited with rapidleech... rapidleech always uploads at server speeds.. but sborg fucks the speeds

[roxorlol]

ftp client is the fast.