Twitter Traffic

[BlackHatKnight]

You all know that when you follow people, 10% will follow you back
so if you want 20,000 follower you have to follow 200,000
but now you don't have to do that, all you have to do is to make a new
account give it to me with your targeted keywords and i will follow people
based on your keyword

Q&A:-

Q- Why i have to make a new twitter account ?
A- because if i was a scammer you don't lose everything

Q- how mush keyword can i give to you ?
A- as you want

Q- how mush traffic can i buy ?
A- as you want, but the more traffic you need, the more keyword you will
have to give

Q- What if my twitter account get suspended ?
A- it wont, but if it get suspended you will get your money back

Q-You didn't tell me how mush this will cost me ?
A- as low as $1 per 1000 people you follow

Q- do you have a prove or you just talk to get our money ?
A- i ask JJJ the moderator for his account so i can give him 1000 follower
and get his review ( he will post his review when he came back )

Q- how mush people you make JJJ twitter account follow ?
A- 960

Q- why you stop at 960 ?
A- because i hit twitter limit

Q- Why you don't put his account here, so we can check it ?
A- because i don't want his account to report as spam

Q- How many people do you accept ?
A- i didn't decide yet, so if you need this tell me before it's too late

Q- What is the payment option ?
A- Paypal only

Q- When i have to pay you before or after you finish the job ?
A- Before

Q- Is there any discount if i order 10000 ?
A- Yes, $1

BlackHatKnight Reviewed by BlackHatKnight on 26th May 2011. Twitter Traffic You all know that when you follow people, 10% will follow you back so if you want 20,000 follower you have to follow 200,000 :O but now you don't have to do that, all you have to do is to make a new account give it to me with your targeted keywords and i will follow people based on your keyword =) Q&A:- Q- Why i have to make a new twitter account ? A- because if i was a scammer :) you don't lose everything Rating: 5

[CyberAff]

any proof? any recent works you did? any reviews mate?

and what kind of method you're using mate? i mean there are many free ways too get
- twitter followers
- facebook likes
- youtube views

etc..

[Jesse]

Seller sent me a pm to make this twitter account for imgkeep and to make a review here: http://twitter.com/#!/imgkeep

I've never used twitter, but we will see what happens with the account. He did deliver exactly what he said he would, so that's a plus.

I made the account, sent him the user/pass to said account, then he did the rest from there.

[Mr.leg]

wow huge terrific prove it man!!!
then i am interested !!

[SairasAnanas]

ok so you get followers, but im intrested if this leads to any traffic on your site, proof of that would be nice, then i can buy this service.

[Mr Happy]

Hang on a sec. Twitter has limits.

You can only follow 1000 people per day and that's the limit you reached with JJJ above but you can only follow up to 2000 people in total irrelevant of the time. After that you can only have 20% more than your number of followers. eg if you have 2000 people following you that means you can only follow 2200.
The 20% figure varies on other criteria but it's 20% in general.

All this makes it impossible to follow several thousand people automatically unless you get huge numbers following you back and as you have stated you can only get about 10% to return the follow just by automatically following them which makes your claims of thousands of followers impossible. Also the 10% is a huge overestimate as can be seen by the number following JJJ. For the 10% to be true JJJ should have 100 followers.

Also following people does not bring you traffic. It's getting TARGETED followers that brings you traffic. Now you can easily get followers as twitter is full of automated bots and getting these to follow you is easy but getting real people who click through is a lot harder.

This is where it get's worse.
Matt Curtis (head of Google Webspam) confirmed that Google can tell spammer or automated accounts on Twitter or "poor quality" users as he refereed to them. This means that having thousands of random 'keyword' followed users hurts your Google organic traffic.


This whole topic is highly flawed.

[iMage]

wow Happy nicely put man.. i was gonna make a reply,i use Twitter,well just thru using Twitterfeed (free). And have been for sometime now,and its not even in the top 50 for refering sites,so its kinda pointless really. Better off using Stumbleupon or Fanpages then Twitter

[kenshin]

cant help but agree with Happy...

anyways if OP is really bent on sayin that this will bring traffic then i guess we should give him a chance by checking JJJs review and any other proof of traffic OP can give...

[Mr Happy]

Thanks iMage.

I should probably back up my claims so here's the proof:

First the Twitter Limits:
http://support.twitter.com/articles/...best-practices

every user can follow 2000 people total. Once you’ve followed 2000 users, there are limits to the number of additional users you can follow: this limit is different for every user and is based on your ratio of followers to following.

About how Search Engines can tell how good a user is:
http://searchengineland.com/what-soc...ly-count-55389

Both Google and Bing tell me that who you are as a person on Twitter can impact how well a page does in regular web search. Authoritative people on Twitter lend their authority to pages they tweet.

When it comes to Facebook, Bing says it doesn’t try to calculate someone’s authority. Google says it does, in some limited cases. However, I’m double-checking on this, as I think that might not be correct.

And incase you don't think Danny Sullivan The Wall St. Journal, USA Today, The Los Angeles Times, Forbes, The New Yorker and Newsweek and ABC's Nightline. is telling the truth here's Matt Curtis from Google WebSpam confirming it at about the 30 second mark




And even MORE:

Danny Sullivan: If an article is retweeted or referenced much in Twitter, do you count that as a signal outside of finding any non-nofollowed links that may naturally result from it?

Bing: We do look at the social authority of a user. We look at how many people you follow, how many follow you, and this can add a little weight to a listing in regular search results. It carries much more weight in Bing Social Search, where tweets from more authoritative people will flow to the top when best match relevancy is used.

Google: Yes, we do use it as a signal. It is used as a signal in our organic and news rankings. We also use it to enhance our news universal by marking how many people shared an article.

Danny Sullivan: Do you try to calculate the authority of someone who tweets that might be assigned to their Twitter page. Do you try to “know,” if you will, who they are?

Bing: Yes. We do calculate the authority of someone who tweets. For known public figures or publishers, we do associate them with who they are. (For example, query for Danny Sullivan)

Google: Yes we do compute and use author quality. We don’t know who anyone is in real life :-)

Danny Sullivan: Do you calculate whether a link should carry more weight depending on the person who tweets it?

Bing: Yes.

Google: Yes we do use this as a signal, especially in the “Top links” section [of Google Realtime Search]. Author authority is independent of PageRank, but it is currently only used in limited situations in ordinary web search.

[ctoveloz]

work or no ?