Friday night the anti-piracy law firm ACS:Law accidentally published its entire email archive online, effectively revealing how the company managed to extract over a million dollars (?636,758.22) from alleged file-sharers since its operation started. On average, 30% of the victims who were targeted paid up, and this money was divided between the law firm, the copyright holder and the monitoring company.

Right before the weekend the notorious ACS:Law managed to expose backups of its entire website and email database to the outside world. Hundreds of people have meanwhile started to dissect the contents of the mails, and are sharing their findings in forums and in comments posted online.
Aside from a lot of personal stuff, regular passwords, PayPal details and private pictures, the emails also shed a whole new light on the effectiveness of the letters of claim that are being sent out to thousands of BitTorrent users and how the recouped money was divided.
The table below details how many letters were sent out to file-sharers over the last two years per client, and how effective these claims were. In total, 11,367 have been sent out. In 40% of the cases the respondents never replied, and another 30% disputed their claim. This means that on average 30% of the accused file-sharers chose to settle by paying between ?350 and ?700 per infringement allegation.

ClientLettersDisputedNon-responders
Digiprotect664019922656Topware590177236Techland364109146Reality Pump2367194Media C.A.T353710661406



Total1136734154538The recouped money is generally divided between three parties. The law firm, the copyright holder and the monitoring company that provided IP addresses of alleged infringers. The shares differ between the various clients, but as can be seen in the table below the law firm always gets a significant portion of the money ? between 37.5% and 52.5%.

ClientShare to Client (%)Share to Firm (%)Share to monitoring company (%)
Digiprotect5037.512.5Reality Pump254233Topware254233Techland334225Media C.A.T3552.512.5Yann Peifer404515So how much money has been made thus far by the parties involved? Previously we could only take ACS:Law owner Andrew Crossley?s word for it. In April this year he used The Law Society Gazette to announce that he had ?recovered close to ?1m for my clients? but unfortunately he can now be seen to have been economical with the truth.
Using figures now available though the email leak, we can see that by 28 April 2010 around $1m (?636,758.22) had been paid by the victims.
In everything that we?ve seen thus far it is clear that the sole motivation of the legal action has been to generate as much money as possible. Documents in the leak show ACS:Law admitting that they asked for a settlement of ?495 in order to break the ?psychological? ?500 barrier to maximize revenues.

ClientMoney RecoveredPaid to ClientPaid to monitoring companyPaid to Firm
Digiprotect?346,607.90?151,625.86?45,060.21?131,048.38Topware?68,127.47?10,880.48?10,881.48?23,551.18Techland?22,474.85?795.93?590.00?2,228.43Reality Pump?34,866.90?3519.16?4,645.28?7,628.20Media C.A.T?164,681.00?35,350.57?15,066.06?55,957.20




Total?636,758.22?202,172.00?76,243.03?220,413.39It is needless to say that ACS:Law?s operation has proven to be quite profitable. However, it is doubtful that this will last. Aside from the information that has come out thus far, the leaked emails contain several bits of information that could put the unfortunate law firm out of business. More on that later.




http://torrentfreak.com/leaked-email...scheme-100926/
deep.j1 Reviewed by deep.j1 on . Leaked Emails Reveal Profits of Anti-Piracy Cash Scheme Friday night the anti-piracy law firm ACS:Law accidentally published its entire email archive online, effectively revealing how the company managed to extract over a million dollars (?636,758.22) from alleged file-sharers since its operation started. On average, 30% of the victims who were targeted paid up, and this money was divided between the law firm, the copyright holder and the monitoring company. Right before the weekend the notorious ACS:Law managed to expose backups of its entire Rating: 5