Activity Stream
48,167 MEMBERS
6653 ONLINE
besthostingforums On YouTube Subscribe to our Newsletter besthostingforums On Twitter besthostingforums On Facebook besthostingforums On facebook groups

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 37
  1.     
    #11
    Member
    ...

  2.   Sponsored Links

  3.     
    #12
    Member
    They?ll save money in bandwidth and lose revenue for sure
    KWWHunction | [✔] 1K Posts

  4.     
    #13
    Member
    download as much as you can before the 27th haha
    to bad for downloaders who bought 1 year premiums

  5.     
    #14
    Member
    I dont think RS lovers using Rapid Pro for Downloads,as user friendly downloads comes in free for downloaders,only few ppl have Pro.
    After MF Period,now Free users hv to leave RS too
    .:x:=> We are Cursed by our Own Soul <=:x:.

  6.     
    #15
    Respected Member
    Website's:
    nooky.us
    I guess we have to go back to using VPNs or switching IPs.

    Might be good for other hosts. Maybe more people choose my Rapidgator links instead of the Rapidshare ones.

  7.     
    #16
    Banned
    lol , they want to save money

  8.     
    #17
    Member
    Its game over for RS!

  9.     
    #18
    Member
    1 gig for free user is way to low means you only getting one movie a day if its only 700 meg or so if its 1.4 gig then your stuffed

    this sounds like a bad idea never used rs any way so i dont care

  10.     
    #19
    It begins...
    Quote Originally Posted by Robin H View Post
    Dont care. I think it's fair.
    I'm happy I can download my own files without limits.
    30GB is plenty if you're not a server.
    1GB for free users does seem a bit low considering they can't download ANY 720p rips or 2CD rips.
    Quote Originally Posted by yudi19 View Post
    Well, RS has to do something to survive in the market.
    So, Blocking extra servers usage is a good move to save money. It's kinda like the Old Limited bandwidth Pro plans.
    Quote Originally Posted by yudi19 View Post
    Well, RS has to do something to survive in the market.
    So, Blocking extra servers usage is a good move to save money. It's kinda like the Old Limited bandwidth Pro plans.
    Quote Originally Posted by cChinta View Post
    lol , they want to save money
    Since the lot of you don't seem to understand, allow me to explain.

    What this new change means if you're a free user and you upload, say, an image file (a meme, for example) of 100KB, your account has a 1GB daily limit.

    This file, if shared publicly, can now be downloaded 10,485 times. After that, none of the files you uploaded can be downloaded by any member of the public; free, premium, or anonymous. Essentially, your account is on 'hold' for the remaining day until your bandwidth resets the next day.

    Changing your IP address is useless, as this limit applies to your ACCOUNT. You're not limited in download traffic, your files are limited on the traffic they generate. You can still download other public files, assuming the account that uploaded said file(s) haven't reached their own bandwidth quotas, etc.

    This does not apply to the files you share with specific contacts, so if you're looking to share illegal content, lol, you'll need to add your downloaders as contacts to bypass this new rule.

    Still feel like being an RS fanboy? I don't think so.

    I personally think this change is going to drive away pirates, yes. But this change is going to cause them a lot more headache than they're signing up for. I can, as of right now, think of hundreds of uses for a free account and legitimate file sharing that this will drive away. People collaborating and delivering their open source projects, for example, via Rapidshare will see their 1GB of file bandwidth running out pretty fast if they're free accounts. 30GB isn't all that grand either for a Rapidpro. But I can understand why Rapidshare would implement this measure.

    In any case, it'll be interesting to see how this new change plays out with Rapidshare.

  11.     
    #20
    Member
    it's a decent deal... what RS do is a wise movement! this way can stop people leeching

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. File-sharing needs fair limits
    By Daniel in forum News & Current Events
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 30th Apr 2011, 07:20 AM
  2. Report: RapidShare Overtakes BitTorrent in File-Sharing Traffic
    By Daniel in forum News & Current Events
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 18th Jan 2011, 08:24 PM
  3. Court Reverses Rapidshare File Sharing Verdict
    By DeathKnell in forum News & Current Events
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 23rd Jul 2010, 08:42 AM
  4. Rapidshare Account Disabling, due to Sharing
    By EvilGenius in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 8th Oct 2009, 07:13 AM
  5. Rapidshare Loses File Sharing Suit, Fined $34 Million
    By DJGaurav in forum News & Current Events
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2nd Aug 2009, 08:22 AM

Tags for this Thread

BE SOCIAL