Is The Chevereto Image Hosting Script Worth $30?

[DEViANCE]

The paid version is $30. The poll is asking if you think that is worth the money or not

[nYXem]

Okay I got it now.
Again, earlier I meant that even the free version can actually be worth $30, but since the paid one has more features and better maintained, as quite obvious, so its certainly worth $30, or may be a bit more too.

[DEViANCE]

Yeah I agree... I want to see Hx's comment here. He thinks it is not worth the money and that the free scripts are better.

[EW-Team]

If some on have intress to for this script mastiimage.com PM me

[Kedzi]

Yes it does, but if you know what you're doing I guess you can use the free version and edit it to your taste

[MsJacquiiC]

CF Image Hosting Script is probably a better alternative. And it's open source. I'm running the pro version here - You can make a donation to gain access to the pro version. Yeah - CF Image hosting script any day...

J.

[bachbell]

CF Image Hosting Script is probably a better alternative. And it's open source. I'm running the pro version here - You can make a donation to gain access to the pro version. Yeah - CF Image hosting script any day...

J.

thanks bro , gonna check it

[HostFont]

I dont think its worth of 30$..

[softleaks]

it sucks dude.

but this is cool and its simple and free : foto.pk

[rodolfo]

Well.. The "NB" release is crap, no question about it. But measure the 2.0 thinking that is the same that the NB? They're different things... Way different. I know that they are different because I'm the creator of Chevereto so I think that I know why I'm telling you that.

In my opinion 30 USD is cheap because you get lifetime license, multi-domain, copyright removal and not one single line of encoded source.

But anyway I'm not here to promote my script. I just wanted to make a clear statement telling you that NB and 2.X are different scripts.